You can use SRS just for spaced re-reading, without any retrieval practice. You can do passive re-reading in Anki just as you could in SM. Retrieval Practice really is about how you formulate your cards/items to maximize the retrieval practice, rather than the nature of the software. In terms of retrieval practice, there’s nothing to compare in this aspect. Judging its effectiveness and efficiency against SM-17 based on SM-2 is not applicable. Second, the algorithm from Anki’s modified SM-2 is a class of its own. It’s not the same as SM-2. Why? First, changing any parameter in the Anki setting means another modified version of Anki’s modified SM-2. Maybe your modified SM-2 is better or worse than SM-2. If you have modified any of the Anki’s parameters, any comparison from SuperMemo’s site is not quite applicable. I believe the algorithm in SM-17 is superior than the old one implemented/modified in Anki.
It’s been 3 months since I’ve written that piece. Although they are both the same in nature, the effectiveness and efficiency of the algorithm however, is different.
#How to delete anki app software#
Please see Which Algorithm is Better? SuperMemo’s or Anki’s? to read my two cents about the algorithms between Anki and SM.īoth Anki and SuperMemo are based on spaced repetition, hence the name Spaced Repetition Software (SRS). Spaced Repetition is the very core of both software.
0 kommentar(er)
